THE OBSCENITY OF ZIONISM

THE OBSCENITY OF ZIONISM

“Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some
of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are
afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle,
so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak
above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.” –Woodrow Wilson

The Obscenity of Zionism

Under his “New Freedom” program, Woodrow Wilson brought the American people under abject slavery with his 1913 Federal Income Tax amendment to the US Constitution. Along with the 16th amendment came the ratification of the IRS, installed as a division of the US Treasury Department.
Prior to Wilson’s robbing of the American people, an “income tax” was declared by the Supreme Court in 1894 as “unconstitutional.”

Chart 1 reveals the linear connection between the Rothschilds and the Bank of England, and the London banking houses which ultimately control the Federal Reserve Banks through their stockholdings of bank stock and their subsidiary firms in New York. The two principal Rothschild representatives in New York, J. P. Morgan Co., and Kuhn,Loeb & Co. were the firms which set up the Jekyll Island Conference at which the Federal Reserve Act was drafted, who directed the subsequent successful campaign to have the plan enacted into law by Congress, and who purchased the controlling amounts of stock in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in 1914. These firms had their principal officers appointed to the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and the Federal Advisory Council in 1914. In 1914 a few families (blood or business related) owning controlling stock in existing banks (such as in New York City) caused those banks to purchase controlling shares in the Federal Reserve regional banks. Examination of the charts and text in the House Banking Committee Staff Report of August, 1976 and the current stockholders list of the 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks show this same family control.
Source: Federal Reserve Directors: A Study of Corporate and Banking Influence. Staff Report,Committee on Banking,Currency and Housing, House of Representatives, 94th Congress, 2nd Session, August 1976.
http://www.save-a-patriot.org/files/view/whofed.html >>To view charts<<

"Paper is poverty, …. it is only the ghost of money, and not money itself." — Thomas
Jefferson, 1788

1743: Mayer Amschel Bauer, an Ashkenazi Jew, is born in Frankfurt,
Germany, the son of Moses Amschel Bauer, a money lender and the
proprietor of a counting house.

1811: The charter for the Rothschilds Bank of the United States runs out
and Congress votes against its renewal. Nathan Mayer Rothschild is not
amused and he states,
"Either the application for renewal of the charter is granted, or the United
States will find itself involved in a most disastrous war." However the
United States stands firm and the Charter is not renewed, which causes
Nathan Mayer Rothschild to issue another threat, "Teach those impudent
Americans a lesson. Bring them back to colonial status." 1812: Backed by
Rothschild money, and Nathan Mayer Rothschild's orders, the British
declare war on the United States. The Rothschilds plan was to cause the
United States to build up such a debt in fighting this war that they would
have to surrender to the Rothschilds and allow the charter for the
Rothschild owned First Bank of the United States to be renewed.
"I care not what puppet is placed upon the throne of England to rule the
Empire on which the sun never sets. The man who controls Britain's
money supply controls the British Empire, and I control the British
money supply." He would go onto brag that in the 17 years he had been in
England he had increased the £20,000 stake given to him by his father,
2500 times to £50 million. The Rothschilds also use their control of the
Bank of England to replace the method of shipping gold from country to
country and instead used their five banks spread across Europe to set up a
system of paper debits and credits, the banking system of today. –Nathan
Mayer Rothschild in 1815

1836: Following his years of fighting against the Rothschilds and their
central bank in America, President Andrew Jackson finally succeeds in
throwing the Rothschilds central bank out of America, when the bank's
charter is not renewed. It would not be until 1913 that the Rothschilds
would be able to set up their third central bank in America, the Federal
Reserve, and to ensure no mistakes are made, this time they will put one
of their own bloodline, Jacob Schiff, in charge of the project.

1865: In a statement to Congress, President Abraham Lincoln states,
"I have two great enemies, the Southern Army in front of me, and the
financial institutions in the rear. Of the two, the one in my rear is my
greatest foe." Later that year, on April 14, President Lincoln is
assassinated, less than two months before the end of the American Civil
War.
1876: Otto von Bismarck states,
"The division of the United States into two federations of equal force was
decided long before the civil war by the high financial power of Europe.
These bankers were afraid that the United States, if they remained in one
block and as one nation, would attain economical and financial
independence, which would upset their financial domination over the
world. The voice of the Rothschild's predominated. They foresaw the
tremendous booty if they could substitute two feeble democracies,
indebted to the financiers, to the vigorous Republic, confident and selfproviding.
Therefore they started their emissaries in order to exploit the
question of slavery and thus dig an abyss between the two parts of the
Republic."

Ashkenazi Jew, Theodor Herzl, who would state in his diaries,
"It is essential that the sufferings of Jews become worse, this will assist in
realization of our plans. I have an excellent idea, I shall induce anti-
Semites to liquidate Jewish wealth. The anti-Semites will assist us
thereby in that they will strengthen the persecution and oppression of
Jews. The anti-Semites shall be our best friends."

On March 29th The Times of London reports on the Bolsheviks in Russia,
"One of the curious features of the Bolshevist movement is the high
percentage of non Russian elements among its leaders. Of the twenty or
thirty commissaries, or leaders, who provide the central machinery of the
Bolshevist movement, not less than 75% were Jews." It is reported that
the Rothschilds were angry with the Russians because they were not
prepared to allow them to form a central bank within their nation. They
therefore gathered groups of Jewish spies and sent them into Russia to
drum up a revolution for the benefit of the common man, which was
actually a takeover of Russia by a Rothschild controlled satanic elite.
These Jewish spies were, in age old deceptive Ashkenazi tradition, given
Russian names, for example Trotsky was a member of the first group and
his original name was Bronstein. These groups were sent to areas
throughout Russia to incite riots and rebellion.
"The establishment of a central bank is 90% of communizing a nation."
—-Vladimir Lenin

1925: This year's Jewish Encyclopaedia, states of the existence of
Ashkenazi Jews (who represent approximately 90% of so-called world
Jewry), with the startling admission that the so called enemy of the Jews,
Esau (also known as Edom, see Genesis 36:1), now actually represents
the Jewish race, when on page 42 of Volume V it is stated,
"Edom is in modern Jewry." So what they're basically saying is that these
Ashkenazi Jews, who represent 90% of the so-called Jewish population,
are actually gentiles or goyim themselves.

President Roosevelt, born of a Jewish mother, therefore satisfying
Ashkenazi rules of being Jewish, orders the all- seeing eye to be placed
upon all new dollar bills along with the motto, "Novus Ordo Seclorum."
This is Latin for, "A New Order of the Ages." –1933

The hydra of "Fundamental Christianity" is built
upon a hybrid and mongrel faith. It is the epitome
of blasphemous pretension and its deception has
been accomplished by its juxtaposition (use) of
Christian symbols and a parallelism of Bible
language. It is a desecrating horror with a
seductive appeal based on prophecy. It is the
spirit of world-wide carnage which has reached
crescendo proportions. It appropriates Christ's
kingdom of salvation to a world political state
under the veil of Biblical language and
expressions. It is power politics operating to
control humanity with a world government
religion. It is Zionism.–The UNION JACK

I hope we shall… crush in its birth the aristocracy of our
moneyed corporations, which dare already to challenge our
government to a trial of strength and bid defiance to the laws of
our country.” –Thomas Jefferson to George Logan, 1816.

"The people are the masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert it"Abraham Lincoln

Definition A: A theorem obeying the following conditions:
1. It is self-evident in a reflective rather than physical way.
2. It describes a primary phenomenon.
3. It is a priori to complex historical events.
4. It is universalizable.
5. It is irrefutable without performative contradiction.
6. It is irreducible.
is called an axiom.

From the days of the Pharaohs down to this period, man, from his instinctive
veneration for a Supreme Being, has been so peculiarly susceptible to the
arts, wiles, and cunning of priest-craft to such a degree as to excite
universal surprise.
Those gross superstitions, engrafted on the inherent religious nature of man,
by that wary intellectual superiority, which weighed down the noblest traits
of the human mind; which bred bitter religious animosities; unheard of
extortion's by the corrupt and infamous priestly aristocracies of various socalled
religions, were the well-matured and craftily-devised schemes for
plunder by designing men.–M. W. WALBERT, THE COMING BATTLE
That there is a gigantic combination of the money dealers, a powerful
international trust of usurers, asserting a superiority above all
jurisdictions, and having for its servants the so-called statesmen and
potentates of various nations, who willingly register the decrees of this
money power upon the statute-books of the respective states, is a fact that
can be sustained by irrefutable evidence.
This great international monetary trust now menaces the
very life of this nation, and the people must dethrone it
and subordinate it to their will, or American liberty will
vanish.
The Declaration of Independence, which announced the true principles of
government, was a memorable protest against the rapacious money power composed
of the landed aristocracy, the trading, commercial, and manufacturing
interests of England, which, by a long series of vicious and unconstitutional
acts of Parliament, sought to eat out the substance of the colonists.

A collage diploma is nothing more than evidence of four added years of conditioning and mind
control.

The Federal Reserve System is not Federal; it has no reserves; and it is not a system
at all, but rather, a criminal syndicate. From November, 1910, when the conspirators
met on Jekyll Island, Georgia, to the present time, the machinations of the Federal
Reserve bankers have been shrouded in secrecy.
–Eustace Mullins

Will we continue to be enslaved by the Babylonian debt money system which was set
up by the Federal Reserve Act in 1913 to complete our total destruction? This is the
only question which we have to answer, and we do not have much time left to answer
it.–Mullins

Here are the simple facts of the great betrayal. Wilson and House knew
that they were doing something momentous. One cannot fathom men’s
motives and this pair probably believed in what they were up to. What
they did not believe in was representative government. They believed in
government by an uncontrolled oligarchy whose acts would only become
apparent after an interval so long that the electorate would be forever
incapable of doing anything efficient to remedy depredations.
–EZRA POUND

"The appalling thing … is not the tumult but the design"
Lord Acton (Essays on the French Revolution).

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “THE OBSCENITY OF ZIONISM

    • Wow…almost three years have gone by and I finally check back and find your comment Anna. Sorry it took so long.

      Thank you for the compliment, I hope you see my tardy reply.

      \\][//

  1. As I say in the body of the article, ‘A collage diploma is nothing more than evidence of four added years of conditioning and mind-control..’ This is gone into in great detail in the article on Compulsory Schooling and Indoctrination at the second link above.
    \\][//

  2. I should also like to explain, as I have done previously in many of my other articles on Zionism; that it has nothing to do with Judaism, in other as a cover for a political agenda. That agenda is based on the concept that “Might is Right” and promoted by, “The Ends are Justified by the Means”. This is simply a manifestation of Realpolitik. This mindset has no boundaries as far as religious or theological beliefs.

    Even the infamous ‘Protocols’ are likely not written by “Jews” in the religious sense of that term. They were ZIONISTS first and foremost as described above.
    \\][//

  3. Western “Mainstream Media” Extremism: Distortion, Fabrication and Falsification
    By Prof. James Petras

    With the collapse of the Communist countries in the 1990’s and their conversion to capitalism, followed by the advent of neo-liberal regimes throughout most of Latin America, Asia, Europe and North America, the imperial regimes in the US and EU have established a new political spectrum, in which the standards of acceptability narrowed and the definition of adversaries expanded.

    Over the past quarter century, the US and EU turned their focus from systemic adversaries (anti-capitalist and anti-imperial states and movements) to attacking capitalist regimes, which

    (1) had adopted nationalist, re-distributive and Keynesian policies;

    (2) had opposed military interventions, coups and bases;

    (3) had aligned with non-Western capitalist powers;

    (4) had opposed Zionist colonization of Palestine and Gulf State-financed Islamist terrorists;

    (5) and had refuse to follow the financial agendas dictated by Wall Street and the City of London investment houses, speculators and vulture funds.

    The Western imperial regimes (by which we mean the US, Canada and the EU) have exercised their political, military, economic and propaganda powers to

    (1) eliminate or limit the variety of capitalist options;

    (2) control the kinds of market-state relations; and

    (3) secure compliance through punitive military invasions, occupations and economic sanctions against targeted adversaries.

    The ‘Media Troika’: the Financial Press and Political Warfare

    The major financial newspapers of record in the United States have played a key role in disseminating the post-communist political line regarding what are acceptable capitalist policies: The Wall Street Journal, (WSJ), the New York Times (NYT), and the Financial Times (FT) – the ‘Troika’ – have systematically engaged in political warfare acting as virtualpropaganda arms of the US and EU imperialist governments in their attempts to impose and/or maintain vassal state status on countries and economies, ‘regulated’ according to the needs of Western financial institutions.

    The propaganda Troika not only reflects the interests and policies of the ruling elites, but their editors, journalists and commentators shape policies through their reportage, analyses and editorials.

    The Troika’s methods of political operation and the substance of their policiespreclude any kind of balanced reportage.

    Day in and day out, the Troika (1) fabricates ‘crises’ for adversaries and illusory promises of ‘recovery’ for vassals; (2) distorts and/or omits favorable information regarding adversaries, dismissing targeted regimes as ‘authoritarian’ and ‘corrupt’. In contrast, obedient and submissive rulers are described as ‘pragmatic’ and ‘realist’. The Troikaattributes ‘military threats’ and ‘aggressive behavior’ to adversaries engaged in defensive policies, while labeling vassal state invasions or aggression as justified, retaliatory or defensive.

    A close reading of the reportage by the stable of Troika scribes over the past 2 years reveals the repeated use of vitriolic and highly charged terms in describing adversarial leaders. This prepares the reader for the one-sided, negative assessment of past, present and future policies adopted by the targeted regime.

    Once the imperial states and the Troika decide on targeting a government and its leaders, all the subsequent ‘news’ is designed to present the motives of these leaders as ‘perfidious’ and the economic and social impact of their policies as ‘catastrophic’.

    And whenever the ‘Troika’s’ analyses or predictions or prognostications turned out to be blatantly wrong – there are never corrections. Brazen lies are glossed over with nary a ripple in their smooth fabric of propaganda.

    Once a government is designated as ‘enemy’ (ripe for ‘regime change’), the Troika recycles the same hostile messages almost daily. The readers, upon viewing Troika headlines, already know at least three quarters of the content of the ‘article’. A small portion of a report may refer tangentially to some particular event or policy decision for which the diatribe launched.

    Working hand-in-hand with Western imperial regimes, the Troika targets the same regimes, using the exact same terms dished out by imperial policy spokesmen and women.

    In this essay, we will discuss the main regimes and policies targeted by the Troika and its Western imperial state partners. We will then proceed to evaluate Troika facts, interpretations and their track record from the beginning of the onslaught to the present. We will conclude by examining the conversion of the mainstream ‘serious’ financial press into a triumvirate of tub-thumping warmongers.

    The Troika’s Targeted Regimes: Trumpeting Their Sins and Denying Their Successes

    The Troika’s propaganda war not only converges with the imperial states’destabilization policies (‘regime change’) but also is aimed at specific policies and agreementsamong supposed allies, partners and even vassal states.

    The intensity of vitriol and the frequency of hostile articles vary according to the level of conflict between the imperial regime and its target for ‘regime change’. The greater the conflict the more violent the language.

    We find intense Troika hostility, in the form of frequent, hysterical attacks, directed against Russia, China, Venezuela, Argentina and Palestine. Even any suspected ‘deviations’by vassals, like Chile or Brazil, in the form of popular domestic social legislations, are subjected to stern scolding and warnings of dire consequences.

    The Troika Maligns Russia

    The Troika’s attacks vary to some degree with each target. In the case of Russia, theTroika routinely denounces President Vladimir Putin as an authoritarian ruler who has undermined Russian democracy. They claim Russia’s economy is in crisis and facing imminent collapse. They vilify Russia’s military assistance to the Syrian government of Bashar Assad. They question the viability of Russia’s military treaties and economic agreements with China. In sum, the Troika portrays Russia as a once peaceful, democratic law-abiding country (during the kleptocratic years of Boris Yeltsin in the 1990’s), which has been taken over by former secret KGB officials who have embarked on reckless overseas military adventures, while repressing their own ethnic Muslim populations (in Chechnya and Dagestan) and which is being run into the ground because of mismanagement and Western economic sanctions. They never bother to explain why the ‘authoritarian’ Putin maintains a consistently high citizen approval despite the Troika’s litany of evils…

    Troika-Backed Ukrainian Puppet Secures 1% Approval:

    In December 2013, US Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Victoria Nuland, the foul mouth diplomat, puppet dominatrix and austerity zealot, bragged that Washington had poured $5 billion dollars into Ukraine in order to pursue ‘regime change‘and install a puppet regime headed by President Petro Poroshenko and Prime Minister (‘Our Man Yats’) Arseniy Yatsenyuk as Prime Minister. Obedient to his Western sponsors and theTroika, Yatsenyuk proceeded to sign off on an IMF bailout and austerity program slashing salaries and pensions of Ukrainian citizens by half, reducing GNP by 25%, ending fuel and food subsidies and tripling unemployment. These policies brought windfall profits for his billionaire crony capitalists and intensified corruption. The Troika labelled the Nuland’s putsch a ‘democratic revolution’, applauding Yastenyuk for vigorously applying the IMF dictated program and predicted a prosperous future…

    As discontent spread and anger mounted among Ukrainian citizens, Yatsenyuk continued to feed his own ego by reading the Troika’s puff-piece editorials lauding his courage for staying the course of austerity and ignoring his compatriots’ opinion polls, up until the October 25, 2015 elections.

    As the elections neared, opinion polls revealed that 99% of the electorate (which excluded millions of restive citizens of the Donbas region) completely rejected Arseniy (now known as ‘Nuland’s arsehole’) Yatsenyuk. Faced with the universal rejection of his starvation policies and crony capitalism, he withdrew his party (the Popular (sic) Front) from the election, but not from the ‘democratic’ government…

    For two years the Troika had praised the Kiev junta, fabricating ‘reports’ about Kiev’s positive economic ‘reforms’ ….which had benefited the 1% corrupt oligarchs while impoverishing the masses. The Western propaganda mills systematically distorted popular reaction among the Ukrainian citizens, citing imaginary ‘anonymous experts’ and phantom ‘men in the street’ in praise of the debacle. Never had the Troika engaged in such blatantlydeceptive ‘journalism’ as its account of the two years of pillage and mass immiseration under Prime Minister Yatsenyuk. And when ‘Yats’ was faced with total repudiation, he blithely dismissed Ukrainian public opinion, claiming he was ‘not concerned by temporary (sic) political party ratings’. His indifference with an electoral repudiation of 99% is rooted in a delusion that he will remain Prime Minister because he is widely praised by the EU, the US, the IMF … and the media Troika.

    The Troika and China: Here Comes the Crash . . .?

    In its ‘journalistic pivot to Asia’, the Troika deprecates China’s high-growth economy by questioning its data and by repeatedly predicting the impending crisis, breakdown and mass disaffection.

    The Troika describes China’s defense policy as a ‘military threat to its neighbors’ and labels its overseas trade and investment policies as ‘neo-colonial exploitation’.

    China’s national campaign against corruption and its prosecution of corrupt officials is dismissed by the Troika as a ‘political purge by a power-hungry president’.

    The Troika attributes Chinese advances in science and technology as mere ‘cyber-theft of Western innovations’.

    The movement of Chinese workers (internal migration) to areas with better paying jobs and investments is called ‘colonization’.

    The Chinese government’s response to terrorism and armed separatists from Tibet and the Western Uighur regions is denounced as “Beijing’s systematic violation of the human rights of minorities”.

    The Troika Castigates Capitalist Argentina (for a Decade of Growth)

    Argentina has been on the Troika’s radar for a decade, despite the fact that it has a center-left government, which rescued capitalism from a total collapse (the Crisis of 1998-2002) restoring the growth of profits. Multi-nationals, like Monsanto and Chevron, enjoy huge returns on their investments in Argentina.

    The Troika denounces the government for running up budget deficits while ignoring the impact of a Manhattan court judgement to award a group of Wall Street ‘vulture fund’ speculators ‘interest payments’ of one-thousand percent on old pre-crisis debt.

    The Troika claims the regime engages in populist excesses, which prevent large-scale inflows of investment capital.

    The Troika describes the recent slowdown in the economy as a ‘deep crisis’, which requires ‘deep structural changes’ (namely the elimination of social funding for pensioners, low income wage earners and school children).

    The Troika paints a catastrophic picture of Argentina: a decaying economy run by a demagogic political leadership engaged in falsifying data…to mask an imminent collapse…Troika and its ‘Hate Venezuela’ Campaign

    The Troika’s journalists and editorial writers, portray Venezuela as an unmitigated disaster: a stagnant and collapsing economy, ruined by an authoritarian populist regime repressing peaceful opposition dissenters.

    According to the Troika, Venezuela is incapable of providing basic goods to consumers. Instead it resorts to draconian confiscation of goods from honest businesses – unjustly accused of hoarding and profiteering. The daily reality of manufactured ‘shortages’ is consistently ignored.

    When the Venezuelan government attempts to stop violent cross border raids by Colombian paramilitary gangs and smugglers it is denounced as arbitrarily repressing Colombian immigrants.

    When Caracas arrests opposition leaders because of their well-documented involvement in violent street demonstrations, promoting the sabotage of power plants and clinics and for planning coups, they are portrayed as violating the ‘human rights of legitimate dissidents.’.

    The Troika never mentions the tens of millions of US dollars provided by Washington to opposition NGOs to pursue its destabilization campaign against Venezuela. It labels US-funded opposition NGO’s as “independent civil society organizations” (just like Ukraine before the putsch).

    For almost 2 decades, the Troika has praised Venezuelan opposition groups as formidable critics of the Chavez-Maduro government, but has never explained to their readers why such ‘formidable’ groups have been soundly defeated in 14 of the 15 elections.

    The Troika and Palestine: In Defense of Israeli Terror

    In its Middle East coverage, the Troika consistently depicts the Palestinians as violent terrorists and aggressors while describing Israelis as their victims. According to the Troika, the Israeli army is engaged in justifiable ‘reprisals’ when they bomb and slaughter Palestinian civilians trapped in Gaza. The endless dispossession of Palestinians of their homes, farms and rights and the violent settler occupation by Israeli Jewish colonists is presented as the just settlement of Jews escaping persecution.

    No mention or little importance is given to:

    (1) Israeli-Jewish desecration of Islamic and Christian religious sites;

    (2) Israeli systematic terror and mass jailing of peaceful protesters.

    Palestinian resistance is described as ‘incendiary, irrational violence’.

    The Troika journalists produce ‘articles’ which are virtually indistinguishable from the press handouts of the Zionist Power Configuration in the US. The Troika even chastises their partner US-EU regimes for their bland criticism or expression of shock at Israel’s most egregious crimes.

    The Troika echoes Israeli and Zionist attacks on international tribunals charging Israeli officials with crimes against humanity. The Troika claims they lack ‘balance’.

    The Troika and Syria: Armchair Generals

    The Troika has demonized the Syrian government of Bashar Assad while backing jihadi terrorists dubbed ‘rebels or ‘moderates’. It has long argued for greater direct military intervention by NATO armies to overthrow the government in Damascus.

    The Troika, masquerading as an independent ‘financial press’ publishes scores of articles by dozens of ‘armchair generals’ who concoct military strategies against Damascus while ignoring heavy economic costs, the social catastrophe of 4 million internal and external Syrian war refugees and the grave consequences of the splitting up a once-unified secular nation-state.

    The Troika and Wayward Neo-Liberals

    The Troika even chastises states and governments which have adopted ‘free market policies’ but maintained or introduced moderate social palliatives. For example, the Chilean regime of Michelle Bachelet fell victim to Troika criticism for promoting a mild increase in corporate taxes and implementing trade union legislation allowing for greater workers’ rights. According to the Troika, these mild reforms have led to economic stagnation, a decline in investment and greater social polarization.

    Evaluation: Unmasking the Troika’s Distortions, Fabrications and Falsifications

    The Troika’s ‘journalism and editorializing’ on Russia has totally distorted its recent political and economic history. Like all confidence men, Troika journalists and editors mix a few threads of facts with patent falsehoods, magnifying defects and minimizing achievements, ignoring positive long-term trends and emphasizing episodic negatives.

    The Troika’s accounts of Russia’s recent military and diplomatic assistance to the Syrian government’s struggle against Islamist terrorists, ignores the achievement in reversing IS advances and stabilizing the central government.

    The Troika paints a specter of Great Russian geopolitical expansion and ignores the long-standing political partnerships and alliances between Russia and major countries in the region, Iraq, Iran, Lebanon, Syria and Jordan.

    With matters ‘economic’, the Troika describes the ‘catastrophic’ impact of US-EU sanctions against Russia over Ukraine, while ignoring the positive long-term results for Russia’s economy –greater self-reliance and investment in manufacturing and agriculture as a stimulus to local producers and the emergence of alternative overseas suppliers and markets, especially China and Iran.

    The Troika highlights Russia’s two-year recession while ignoring a decade and a half of substantial growth after the catastrophic ‘Yeltsin’ years.

    The Troika falsifies past and present political developments. They discretely praise the Western-backed violent gangster-oligarchs who ruled Russia during the pillage years of the 1990’s as a democracy while denouncing the relatively peaceful and competitive elections under the Putin Presidency as ‘authoritarian’.

    The Troika resorts to similar propaganda ploys with China. Any slowdown from China’s three decades of double digit growth gets spun as an imminent collapse, ignoring the fact that the US-European business community can only dream of China’s still robust growth rate of 7%.

    The allegations of Chinese cyber theft of Western science and technology ignore the obvious fact that China’s enormous public investment in basic and applied science and technology in dozens of centers of excellence has produced stunning achievements and levels of scholarship. A review of the international scientific literature and journals – paints an entirely different picture of Chinese advances from that described by the Troika.

    Chinese economic growth through seaborne exports requires major investment and commitment to its maritime routes and security. To counter Chinese growth and assert US supremacy, Washington has signed new, provocative military pacts with Japan, Australia and the Philippines and escalated the intrusion of its planes and ships into Chinese waters and airspace. The Troika labels China’s defense of its waterways as an “aggressive” military threat to its regional neighbors, while US military investments in bases in Asia and constant intelligence gathering exceed Beijing’s five- fold. US warships brazenly violate China’s 12 mile maritime boundary.

    Troika scribes completely ignore the recent history of US and Japanese empires invading dozens of Asian countries, establishing colonies, and killing scores of millions of people. In contrast to the enormous US strategic ring of military bases and communications outposts throughout the Asia-Pacific region, China has no foreign bases or overseas troops – a fact one will never learn from the ‘Troika’

    The Troika’s campaign against Argentina, permeating its pages, minimizes the role of a short-term contemporary slow-down in international demand for commodities and attributes Argentina’s problems to its welfare programs, capital controls and state regulation. TheTroika fails to acknowledge the past decade of growth, prosperity and rising living standards among the people in Argentina.

    The source of Argentine stagnation is not because of a lack of free market policies but the Fernandez regime’s accommodation and promotion of the interests of international bankers, virtually all foreign debt holders (except one notorious ‘vulture’!) and extractive capitalists (agribusiness, Monsanto, Barrack Gold etc.).

    The Troika ignores ‘the decade of infamy’ – the 1990’s – during which Argentina served as a bargain bazaar for the privatization of lucrative public enterprises and eventually collapsed in the 2001 crash with major bank closings, one hundred thousand bankruptcies and five million unemployed (30% of the labor force) – a thoroughly pillaged economy. Instead the Troika fabricates an ideal world of past free market prosperity in order to condemn contemporary Argentine, ignoring the real historical record of a liberal debacle and Keynesian recovery.

    Venezuela is currently in a severe crisis, as the Troika scribes remind us in their shrill reports – blaming it entirely on ‘populist’ (i.e. public spending on social welfare) and ‘nationalist’ policies.

    The Troika ignores the well-documented sabotage by the importers and distributers in the private business community, hoarding, excess profiteering and currency speculation. These problems are exacerbated by the sharp decline of oil revenues resulting from international market forces, and not merely government mismanagement.

    The Troika tells their readers that the Chavez and Maduro governments are authoritarian, ignoring the dozen and a half free and competitive elections since Chavez’ ascent to power. Moreover, the Troika has remained rather quiet over their verbally violent editorial support for the opposition business-led and US embassy-backed military coup in 2002 and an aborted coup in 2014.

    Conclusion

    The Troika: the Wall Street Journal, New York Times and the Financial Times have repeatedly made false prognoses regarding the economic performances of governments targeted for ‘regime change’. Their economic predictions were repeatedly wrong and their readers among the investor public would have lost their shirts if they had taken their cues from the Troika’s editorial pages and bet ‘short’ against China and the rest…

    Their perverse denunciations of Russian and Chinese military defense activities are sharpening world tensions. Their support for ethnic separatists in the Russian Caucuses and western China has encouraged acts of terrorism leading to the deaths of hundreds of Chinese workers murdered by Uighur and Tibetan terrorists, hundreds of Russians at hands of Chechen terrorists and thousands of Russian-speakers in Ukraine’s Donbas region.

    The Troika cannot be relied on for reliable information, especially regarding the economic, political and foreign policies of US and EU adversaries (those targets for ‘Regime change’).

    At most their polemical screeds give the discerning reader an insight into thepropaganda line promoted by the Western powers.

    Moreover in recent times, the Troika has become even more strident and militaristic than the ruling elites. The Troika’s armchair generals mocked Obama for not sending ground troops into Syria; chastised the US and EU for signing the nuclear agreements with Iran; and embraced Israel’s systematic murder of Palestinians.

    Unreliable and more given to strident invective than reporting the facts in a balanced way, the Troika has lost credibility for intelligent, serious readers who strain to ‘read between the lines’ when they write that a government is ‘unpopular’ during elections. More likely than not, the incumbents sweep the elections and retain popular majorities as has been the case so far in Russia, Argentina, Venezuela and elsewhere.

    If and when the Troika succeeds in promoting more wars, as it has been doing in Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen and Somalia, each and every militaristic adventure will lead to economic and social disasters spawning millions more refugees.

    When imperial governments, like England, adopt conciliatory policies toward China, eschewing zero sum confrontations, in favor of win-win cooperation, the Troika’s armchair generals are sure to mock and accuse the conservative government of ‘kowtowing’ to authoritarians – dismissing the $30 billion dollar investment deals.

    The Troika has gone far beyond its earlier role of presenting the line of imperial regimes. They now march, rather independently, to the military drum of real and imagined nuclear warriors and terrorists. Welcome to the “free press” and the ‘lies of our Times’!

    The original source of this article is Global Research
    Copyright © Prof. James Petras, Global Research, 2015
    \\][//

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s