Electronic Media Voodoo Ritual
The maimstream media is just the hooting ululations of the organ grinder’s monkeys
Although the MSM is no longer telling us to care about the people of Egypt, their revolution is still ongoing. Now they are fighting President Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood, who have just declared that he is above the judiciary. But who are the Muslim Brotherhood, where did they come from, and what are their connections? Join us tonight as we examine the American and British intelligence establishment links at the base of this radical Islamic group.
PART 1: The Muslim Brotherhood
The hidden hands of these powerful forces can be seen at work before World War Two with the British travel writer Freya Stark. Stark was not just a writer. She was also an agent of British intelligence. Stark was used by British intelligence to foster an alliance with the Muslim Brotherhood (Dorril 622). Brotherhood collaboration with Western intelligence continued with an alliance between the Brotherhood and the CIA that began around 1955.
According to former CIA agent Miles Copeland, it was around this time that America began looking for the Muslim equivalent of Billy Graham, hoping to use such a charismatic individual to influence the Arab world. When this failed, the Agency began forging ties with the CIA (Aburish 60-61). What was the motive for this marriage between Western intelligence and the Muslim Brotherhood?
This alliance would help the Western power elite neutralize the challenge to their hegemony coming from the secular Arab nationalist movement. Said Aburish elaborates:
In the 1950s and later, the West opposed the secular Arab nationalist movement for two reasons: it challenged its regional hegemony and threatened the survival of its clients’ leaders and countries. Specifically, there was nothing to stop a secular movement from cooperating with the USSR; in fact, most of them were mildly socialist. Furthermore, most secular movements advocated various schemes of Arab unity, a union or a unified policy, which threatened and undermined the pro-West traditional regimes of Saudi Arabia, Jordan and other client states. The West saw it as a challenge that had to be met. (60)
Was the alliance between the CIA and the Brotherhood merely a continuation of the alliance between British intelligence and the Brotherhood? According to the authors of Dope, Inc., the OSS, which was the forerunner of the CIA, was merely a subsidiary of British intelligence (540). When the Office of Strategic Services was being organized, William Stephenson, Britain’s Special Operations Executive representative in the United States, was brought in for “technical assistance” (418). Stephenson’s involvement would lead to the creation of “a British SOE fifth column embedded deeply into the American official intelligence community” (454). When it came to religious engineering to promote fanaticism within the Arab world, it could be that the British power elite passed the mantle to the American power elite.
The power elite officially endorsed the Muslim Brotherhood in May of 1979 at the Bilderberg meeting held in Austria (Engdahl 171). At this meeting, British Islamic expert Dr. Bernard Lewis suggested that endorsing the Muslim Brotherhood would allow the Western elite “to promote balkanization of the entire Muslim Near East along tribal and religious lines” (171). This balkanization process would result in the rise of various autonomous groups and the spreading of chaos in the Near East (171). In what Lewis termed an “Arc of crisis,” the chaos would eventually spill over into the Muslim regions of the Soviet Union (171). This would help the Western elites counter Soviet moves to become the world’s sole hegemon, thus preserving the Cold War dialectical rivalry that had been so advantageous to the Western oligarchs.
– by Paul & Phillip D. Collins ©, Aug. 12th, 2007
Aburish, Said. A Brutal Friendship: The West and the Arab Elite. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2001.
Dorril, Stephen. MI6: Inside the Covert World of Her Majesty’s Secret Intelligence Service. New York: Free Press, 2000.
Editors of Executive Intelligence Review. Dope Inc. Washington, D.C.: Executive Intelligence Review, 1992.
El Ahl, Amira, et. al. ” Dancing With the Devil: Charting the Rise of the Muslim Brotherhood.” Spiegel Online 03 July 2007
Engdahl, F. William. A Century of War: Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order. London: Pluto Press, 2004.
. . . . . . . . . .
Corbett Report Radio 264 – Who Are the Muslim Brotherhood?
. . . . . . . . . . . .
Protocol 13, subsection 6
“6. Who will ever suspect then that ALL THESE PEOPLES WERE STAGE-MANAGED BY US ACCORDING TO A POLITICAL PLAN WHICH NO ONE HAS SO MUCH AS GUESSED AT IN THE COURSE OF MANY CENTURIES?”
. . . . . . . . . . . .
“Now if you really, really dig into these Conspiracy Theories, you will find two things :
A) Some come from people doing real researching into skullduggery in high places. These get little press, and are soon forgotten. Often they are true
B) The most popular and widely spread Conspiracy Theories, originate from Think Tanks funded by major Corporations.”~James Clair Lewis
I call the first, A) Systemic Analysis.
I call the second, B) Conspiracy Theory.
I would modify point B.
I would say that some of the wide spread CTs are real based on the first type of valid research, BUT that they are spun down alleys and dead end streets by the public relations regime.
The main Systemic Analysis works are exceedingly sound, based in historical documentation and rational forensic examination. I would advise the neophyte to take route A, for a sound and grounded base, and let that expand to a full understanding of the architecture and nature of political power.
It CAN be said, that what one may take as a “wild conspiracy theory” as that involving secret societies and the quest for world dominance, with “outlandish” mention of the “ILLUMINATI”…are actually not invalidated by doing real research into the ‘patterns’ of skullduggery, and the interlinking points of power that make a certain grid, and matrix of a central power group with an agenda that has played out throughout several centuries.
And this agenda has proven “prophetic”, as the events of history are testament of. As I think it is more rational to think that this is going to plan because of actual human activity, rather than some ‘mystical’ view into the future from the 18th century. The only way to accurately predict the future is to design and implement it. And the least rational view is to handwave the information without actually knowing the substance of what it is.
This brings us to that agenda I just mentioned, which leads into the most “cursed” and denied “conspiracy theory” of them all, THE PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION.
A rational analysis of this information does not posit that this is a “plot by the Jews”, that is the spin that the Public Relation Regime puts on it, in order to claim that anyone who believes the information is “antisemitic”. This is such a strong, and tightly imposed tabu. That it can genuinely be likened to an enchantment.
And this is where study of and knowledge of cultural anthropology, psychology, mass psychology, and how the technology of mass media is used for social engineering becomes essential. What would be shocking for any reader of this forbidden fruit, the Protocols, is that these very topics and issues are discussed and put to task by the authors of this book.. The technology and those topics are the some of the most important tools to achieve the goals of that agenda.
It is in the details of who is among the central circle that puts the lie to this being simply a “Jewish plot”. It is here that we should acknowledge that there are two spellings of the central nomenclature this is based on. The “Jewish” term “Zion” and the Anglo-Romantic spelling, “Sion”. Both are Jerusalem. Both forces existed even prior to the Crusades.
Neither force has anything to do with the religions they are associated with in the popular mind. The central credo is simply the quest for temporal physical power by any and all means available. Their credo is “might is right”, and “ends are justified by means”. And saccharin ideological covering for this are simply veils for ‘public relations’ purposes.
The New Enemy Voodoo Ritual:
It is commonplace to say that terrorism has replaced communism as the new enemy of western democracy. But this replacement has been selectively applied, geared to the goals of U.S. global hegemony. Washington’s characterization of a foreign government can change radically when little or nothing has changed in that country. The Clinton administration’s most recent pledge of more billions for defense came as the Pentagon upgraded North Korea, Iran, and Iraq, which they call “rogue” states, as no longer “distant” threats of possible nuclear missile attacks, an official position they had held only a few weeks before.(5)
Of course, when this happens, it ought to raise eyebrows among the citizenry. That it doesn’t is often blamed on the average American’s notoriously short political memory, but it is really due to the remarkable ability of the media to accept new policies, new “enemies,” new “threats,” without ever acknowledging their prior, unquestioning acceptance of the old ones.(6)
The U.S. has employed biological weapons for 200 years, from smallpox in the blankets of Native Americans to spreading plagues in Cuba; from chemical weapons like mustard gas to cripple and kill in World War I to Agent Orange to defoliate Vietnam-and to create a generation of deformed children. It is the only nation that has dropped nuclear bombs, and one that now makes, uses, and sells depleted uranium weapons.
The state is a mythical concept, a jejune concept, one that humanity needs to find the maturity to grow out of.
The unquestioning acceptance of this myth, one saturated with internal contradictions, is that which defines the ‘TVZombie’.~ww