EMVR_Logo_wht_lrg cTVZ c21

TVZ c21

Electronic Media Voodoo Ritual
The maimstream media is just the hooting ululations of the organ grinder’s monkeys

Although the MSM is no longer telling us to care about the people of Egypt, their revolution is still ongoing. Now they are fighting President Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood, who have just declared that he is above the judiciary. But who are the Muslim Brotherhood, where did they come from, and what are their connections? Join us tonight as we examine the American and British intelligence establishment links at the base of this radical Islamic group.
~James Corbett

PART 1: The Muslim Brotherhood

The hidden hands of these powerful forces can be seen at work before World War Two with the British travel writer Freya Stark. Stark was not just a writer. She was also an agent of British intelligence. Stark was used by British intelligence to foster an alliance with the Muslim Brotherhood (Dorril 622). Brotherhood collaboration with Western intelligence continued with an alliance between the Brotherhood and the CIA that began around 1955.

According to former CIA agent Miles Copeland, it was around this time that America began looking for the Muslim equivalent of Billy Graham, hoping to use such a charismatic individual to influence the Arab world. When this failed, the Agency began forging ties with the CIA (Aburish 60-61). What was the motive for this marriage between Western intelligence and the Muslim Brotherhood?

This alliance would help the Western power elite neutralize the challenge to their hegemony coming from the secular Arab nationalist movement. Said Aburish elaborates:

In the 1950s and later, the West opposed the secular Arab nationalist movement for two reasons: it challenged its regional hegemony and threatened the survival of its clients’ leaders and countries. Specifically, there was nothing to stop a secular movement from cooperating with the USSR; in fact, most of them were mildly socialist. Furthermore, most secular movements advocated various schemes of Arab unity, a union or a unified policy, which threatened and undermined the pro-West traditional regimes of Saudi Arabia, Jordan and other client states. The West saw it as a challenge that had to be met. (60)

Was the alliance between the CIA and the Brotherhood merely a continuation of the alliance between British intelligence and the Brotherhood? According to the authors of Dope, Inc., the OSS, which was the forerunner of the CIA, was merely a subsidiary of British intelligence (540). When the Office of Strategic Services was being organized, William Stephenson, Britain’s Special Operations Executive representative in the United States, was brought in for “technical assistance” (418). Stephenson’s involvement would lead to the creation of “a British SOE fifth column embedded deeply into the American official intelligence community” (454). When it came to religious engineering to promote fanaticism within the Arab world, it could be that the British power elite passed the mantle to the American power elite.

The power elite officially endorsed the Muslim Brotherhood in May of 1979 at the Bilderberg meeting held in Austria (Engdahl 171). At this meeting, British Islamic expert Dr. Bernard Lewis suggested that endorsing the Muslim Brotherhood would allow the Western elite “to promote balkanization of the entire Muslim Near East along tribal and religious lines” (171). This balkanization process would result in the rise of various autonomous groups and the spreading of chaos in the Near East (171). In what Lewis termed an “Arc of crisis,” the chaos would eventually spill over into the Muslim regions of the Soviet Union (171). This would help the Western elites counter Soviet moves to become the world’s sole hegemon, thus preserving the Cold War dialectical rivalry that had been so advantageous to the Western oligarchs.
– by Paul & Phillip D. Collins ©, Aug. 12th, 2007


Aburish, Said. A Brutal Friendship: The West and the Arab Elite. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2001.
Dorril, Stephen. MI6: Inside the Covert World of Her Majesty’s Secret Intelligence Service. New York: Free Press, 2000.
Editors of Executive Intelligence Review. Dope Inc. Washington, D.C.: Executive Intelligence Review, 1992.
El Ahl, Amira, et. al. ” Dancing With the Devil: Charting the Rise of the Muslim Brotherhood.” Spiegel Online 03 July 2007
Engdahl, F. William. A Century of War: Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order. London: Pluto Press, 2004.
. . . . . . . . . .

Corbett Report Radio 264 – Who Are the Muslim Brotherhood?

. . . . . . . . . . . .

Protocol 13, subsection 6

. . . . . . . . . . . .

“Now if you really, really dig into these Conspiracy Theories, you will find two things :

A) Some come from people doing real researching into skullduggery in high places. These get little press, and are soon forgotten. Often they are true

B) The most popular and widely spread Conspiracy Theories, originate from Think Tanks funded by major Corporations.”~James Clair Lewis

I call the first, A) Systemic Analysis.

I call the second, B) Conspiracy Theory.

I would modify point B.

I would say that some of the wide spread CTs are real based on the first type of valid research, BUT that they are spun down alleys and dead end streets by the public relations regime.

The main Systemic Analysis works are exceedingly sound, based in historical documentation and rational forensic examination. I would advise the neophyte to take route A, for a sound and grounded base, and let that expand to a full understanding of the architecture and nature of political power.

It CAN be said, that what one may take as a “wild conspiracy theory” as that involving secret societies and the quest for world dominance, with “outlandish” mention of the “ILLUMINATI”…are actually not invalidated by doing real research into the ‘patterns’ of skullduggery, and the interlinking points of power that make a certain grid, and matrix of a central power group with an agenda that has played out throughout several centuries.

And this agenda has proven “prophetic”, as the events of history are testament of. As I think it is more rational to think that this is going to plan because of actual human activity, rather than some ‘mystical’ view into the future from the 18th century. The only way to accurately predict the future is to design and implement it. And the least rational view is to handwave the information without actually knowing the substance of what it is.

This brings us to that agenda I just mentioned, which leads into the most “cursed” and denied “conspiracy theory” of them all, THE PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION.

A rational analysis of this information does not posit that this is a “plot by the Jews”, that is the spin that the Public Relation Regime puts on it, in order to claim that anyone who believes the information is “antisemitic”. This is such a strong, and tightly imposed tabu. That it can genuinely be likened to an enchantment.

And this is where study of and knowledge of cultural anthropology, psychology, mass psychology, and how the technology of mass media is used for social engineering becomes essential. What would be shocking for any reader of this forbidden fruit, the Protocols, is that these very topics and issues are discussed and put to task by the authors of this book.. The technology and those topics are the some of the most important tools to achieve the goals of that agenda.

It is in the details of who is among the central circle that puts the lie to this being simply a “Jewish plot”. It is here that we should acknowledge that there are two spellings of the central nomenclature this is based on. The “Jewish” term “Zion” and the Anglo-Romantic spelling, “Sion”. Both are Jerusalem. Both forces existed even prior to the Crusades.

Neither force has anything to do with the religions they are associated with in the popular mind. The central credo is simply the quest for temporal physical power by any and all means available. Their credo is “might is right”, and “ends are justified by means”. And saccharin ideological covering for this are simply veils for ‘public relations’ purposes.

The New Enemy Voodoo Ritual:

It is commonplace to say that terrorism has replaced communism as the new enemy of western democracy. But this replacement has been selectively applied, geared to the goals of U.S. global hegemony. Washington’s characterization of a foreign government can change radically when little or nothing has changed in that country. The Clinton administration’s most recent pledge of more billions for defense came as the Pentagon upgraded North Korea, Iran, and Iraq, which they call “rogue” states, as no longer “distant” threats of possible nuclear missile attacks, an official position they had held only a few weeks before.(5)

Of course, when this happens, it ought to raise eyebrows among the citizenry. That it doesn’t is often blamed on the average American’s notoriously short political memory, but it is really due to the remarkable ability of the media to accept new policies, new “enemies,” new “threats,” without ever acknowledging their prior, unquestioning acceptance of the old ones.(6)

The U.S. has employed biological weapons for 200 years, from smallpox in the blankets of Native Americans to spreading plagues in Cuba; from chemical weapons like mustard gas to cripple and kill in World War I to Agent Orange to defoliate Vietnam-and to create a generation of deformed children. It is the only nation that has dropped nuclear bombs, and one that now makes, uses, and sells depleted uranium weapons.


The state is a mythical concept, a jejune concept, one that humanity needs to find the maturity to grow out of.
The unquestioning acceptance of this myth, one saturated with internal contradictions, is that which defines the ‘TVZombie’.~ww



7 thoughts on “VOODOO RITUAL 1

  1. “It {television} affects the psychology of people who watch. It increases the passivity of people who watch. It changes family relationships. It changes understandings of nature. It flattens perception so that information, which you need a fair amount of complexity to understand it as you would get from reading, this information is flattened down to a very reduced form on television. And the medium has inherent qualities which cause it to be that way.”~ Mander


  2. Partial Blogliography of Hybridrogue1




























    http://cotocrew.wordpress.com/2010/08/14/10452/ Titled; The Obscenity of Zionism







  3. >”Underground fires, whether fed by nanothermite or other incendiaries, require oxygen. There is only ONE source of igniting and maintaining a fire without a constant feed of oxygen.”~Prager
    . . . . .
    This is not true. Thermites contain their own source of oxygen.
    There is also no proof that that aftermath ‘pile’ was utterly starved of oxygen. This is an assumption to favor the Nuke hypothesis.
    The ‘pile’ was a vast, extremely chaotic landscape several stories high and several stories below grade.
    There is simply no way to make a definitive assessment of the general nature of the pile.~ww

    >“Dr. Jones is a fraud.”~Prager
    . . . . . .
    And this is the real motive behind Prager’s efforts. Just like Wood, Reynolds, Fetzer, and others pushing these New Wave 9/11 theories: it is the attempted character assassination of Prof. Jones.
    . . . . .

    Explosive velocities:
    DDF – 10,000mps HMX – 9,100mps RDX – 8,750mps TNT – 6,900MPS Jones’ Thermite 300-895mps

    “The velocity of thermite is far too low yet the velocity of standard explosives is extraordinarily high and the total destruction would have been inconceivable.”~Prager
    . . . . . .
    Totally absurd reasoning above. To assert that the destruction by the high explosives would be too high as to be “inconceivable”, is to assert that the perpetrators had no knowledge of the craft of explosive demolitions, and would not know how much explosives to use to achieve the desired final results.

    . . . . . . . . . . .
    Dear Jeff

    I have briefly examined the paper presenting an argument on the basis of “trace element” concentrations in dust and on girder residues from the WTC that the buildings that they were destroyed by nuclear fission.

    The arguments are incorrect for a number of reasons. However, the evidence is interesting and I will briefly discuss the issues.

    Barium and Strontium are not trace elements, they are common constituents of any material that contains Calcium (concrete) as they are in the same chemical group and occur together. I agree however that they are present in very much higher amounts than they should.
    Both elements are toxic but not highly toxic
    A correlation between Ba and Ca would be expected in any sample since they occur together and with Ca because they are in Group II of the periodic table and share chemistry.
    But it is highly unusual to find such high levels of Barium
    I also found high levels Barium and Strontium in war debris in Gaza, Fallujah Iraq and the Lebanon.
    You do not get high levels of Bariums and Strontium from nuclear fission. They are both fission products in the form Ba-140 and Sr-89 and Sr-90 but the quantities in grams are ridiculously low. You must not confuse activity (becquerels) with mass (grams). The whole of the Sr-90 releases from Fukushima or from Chernobyl amount to a few grams. A fission yield of a 2 Megaton Test (which would have destroyed New York entirely) would make only which 1014Bq of Sr-90 and represents 18grams. For Barium it is less than a gram. So this argument about too much Sr and Ba does not work. The argument is even more absurd when applied to Thorium (see below).
    C-14 is not formed by fission but by neutron activation.
    Although Thorium-234 is formed by fission or Uranium, the quantities are even smaller than Ba and Sr because the half-life of Th-234 is less than a month. So the amount of Th-234 made from 1 gram of U-239 is less than 1 x 10-11g.
    The ratio of U to Th on this basis would be 1011.

    OK let’s move on to what could have happened based on my deconstruction of the data from the war zones:

    The concentration of Uranium is a key. This is slightly too high in the dust and much too high in the girder coatings. The activities for 2.7, 3.2, 4.7 and 7.57 are 33, 40, 58 and 93Bq/kg. The graph shows that there is too much U on the girder coatings. Normal levels of U are about 12, at most 40Bq/kg
    My belief is that there is a cold fusion weapon or device of some sort. This employs Uranium and Deuterium. The output is neutrons, lots of heat, lots of energy, gamma radiation. The devise is the size of an apple or grapefruit but heavy (20-40kg). No radioactivity after the explosion except from Tritium H-3 which together with He-4 is the product and some short lived gamma radiation from neutron activations products (e.g. Ca-45 from the Ca in the concrete, Fe-55 from the steel). These would be radioactive for a few days only. [emphasis mine]
    You would thus expect to find too much Uranium and also Tritium. You find both. There is a paper showing high levels of Tritium in the water at WTC. We also see U levels are too high.
    Maybe the Barium is part of this mixture, and the Strontium. I have certainly found high levels of both in the war samples.
    Regards, Chris Busby

    JeffPrager – September 22, 2012 – 1:15 am
    Dr. Jones must be assumed to be a brilliant and knowledgeable physicist specifically in cold fusion, muon catalyzed fusion, deuterium, lithium deuteride and similar elements associated with cold fusion and we should assume, fission. He knows. He can’t possibly be, by any stretch of the imagination, anything other than part of the pre-planned public response strategy.
    , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

    Jones does indeed discuss these issues in his paper disputing the nuclear aspect of WTC.
    Busby is ‘begging the question’ and knows well enough the other means for such substances to be present in the dust.
    Prager is simply assinine and knows zip about nuclear physics. He is just a PR agent on a spin.


  4. 9/11 TRUTH MOVEMENT – R.I.P. (September 9, 2001 – May 17, 2015)

    Well it only took about 14 years but the “movement” was finally buried just a few days ago…

    May 17, 2015 at 7:52 pm
    Seriously, did anyone but the terminally naive think that an apparatus such as AIA would come to any but a politically acceptable conclusion?

    Just as I have always argued, you are not dealing with rationality here, you are dealing with a completely pathological system. The majority of the people living on this planet today are going to die stupefied, still in trance.

    Paul Zarembka
    May 18, 2015 at 8:11 am
    I am an economist by profession and there are professional, peer reviewed articles exposing insider trading before September 11th, even in ‘mainstream’ professional journals. In this respect (rightly or wrongly), this other 9-11 topic is ahead of the topic of controlled demolition. Yet, never in my dreams did I imagine going to the American Economics Association’s meeting, just as large as AIA’s, and asking them to vote for study of insider trading before September 11th, even though many of AEA members have that protection of ‘tenure’.

    You don’t want to commit suicide for either the topic of insider trading or of controlled demolition.

    I am sorry, but I think asking for that vote was a mistake. Who said, “timing is everything”?

    Also, I don’t understand why Richard Gage had nothing to say in evaluation thereafter, as if nothing had happened.

    May 18, 2015 at 10:24 am
    “Also, I don’t understand why Richard Gage had nothing to say in evaluation thereafter, as if nothing had happened.”

    It is all quite surreal. Isn’t it Paul?

    Some might propose some sinister intent on Gage’s part, but I think not. I think Richard Gage is a delusional fool. He has been politically naive throughout this whole trip. I mean a real dumbfuck, to speak frankly.

    You say “mistake” … huh, I say tragedy. A goats play. Completely absurd.

    In my honest assessment, I must say that most of the so-called “9/11 Truth leaders” have been jejune fools strategically & politically. They turned the so-called “movement” into a fading historical afterthought.

    Dust to dust, ashes to ashes…

    “Secret Agent Man”

    You know I live a life of danger for the FBI
    Keeping tabs on our nation on the land, on the sea, in the sky
    But every single night before I go to bed
    I get down on my knees and thank God
    I’m a secret agent man

    Secret agent man, secret agent man
    They’ve given me a number
    But they’ve taken away my name

    I got one hell of a job to perform for the U.S. of A
    Got the responsibility of our nation’s top security
    But every night and day, I salute the flag and say,
    “Thank you, Jesus,” ’cause I’m
    I’m a secret agent man

    Secret agent man, secret agent man
    They’ve given me a number
    But they’ve taken away my name

    You know they got me doin’ this, doin’ that
    And a little bit of something else
    Fighting cavities of evil and safeguarding America’s health
    But not an afternoon passes I don’t get up off my ass
    Thank you, God, ’cause I’m
    I’m a secret agent man

    Secret agent man, secret agent man
    They’ve given me a number
    But they’ve taken away my name

    ‘Cause I’m a secret agent man
    . . . . . .

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s