You’re The One Who Wanted The Bulldog


This is a page for personal stories and individual angst.

It is about ‘self talk’ and throwing your life down the drain while digging for gold. It’s about the human condition and conditioning, and how that relates to relations with other humans, other beings and the universe. It’s about life in the meat package, and what may follow.

I will probably explain the title somewhere in the comments section. But we can never be sure of anything. Can we?

Willy Whitten – \\][//


59 thoughts on “You’re The One Who Wanted The Bulldog

  1. I just want to remind you all that there is no fuckin’ cussing allowed on this blog.
    So watch your cocksuckin’ language. Got that?

    You fuck up, and I’ll call Barry and have him take you out with a dronemobile.


  2. Fucking A! I once swore to predict the constitution, cuss it’s all Ainu, but I’m a minor oatkeeper.
    So, did Barry have anything to do with “Fuddy Duddy”?

    I can see why Trooper Vance hates the ‘social media’….not enough swearing for him and too much for us keepers of the fate. Pure bullshit is my Maine degradiant…Connecticutt I would not even go there.

    • Well cheesengrimer Mr Jack…issa spittin’ image graven and craven and spitting that dragon’s fire of ire transgoobled into soulrot flambe.

      Aren’t YOU the one who wanted that fucking bulldog? I thunkit Margret wuzzer name. Like that drink, a Margarita with the lemon slice and slushy filling. But I fergit fer shur cuz it’s been a long ride through the cosmos since I last ett meskin food.

      Hey does your antivirus ever step in and take command and tell you that you kaint downloob something cuz it has ‘adware’ init? Shitsicles and watermelon rind that’s chunky.

      I wanted to download Windows Movie Maker and my antiviralist grabbed me by the bees and squeezed ’till I sang Dixie.


      • Margret, Margret, she is not ringing a bell….unless it was Taco Bell?
        Did she have a pit bull?. Do I sound like I am on margaritas? That could just be my router ya know.
        My antiviralist is free AVG, worth every penny. Back up the truck.

      • The answer to the Quiz: Margret Thatcher, the bulldog du jour at the time the pup came into my life.

        As per Connally in your question as to my take; I think he thought the assassination would take place at the Trade Mart where the speech was to be given. He wouldn’t have been in that limo if he knew the current plan of the day. So I would say he had the general knowledge, but not the detail of the plan.
        I Think only the shooters, and the top dogs in the secret service knew the details to keep it all contained tightly…of course the brass that had planned it would have known; that’s Landsdale et al.. and the people at the party at Clint’s little rancho.


      • I concur with your analysis of the hit, Will. For the graduating sixth graders, may I say Rogue’s the masta blasta historian in my book, The Controversy of Neon, styled after Douglas Reed’s epic. I think it was Prouty who put up the pictures from Dealey Plaza of (purportedly) Lansdale, HW, and even the kid, GW. I like the photo of GW looking like a lost puppy while Poppy was away being questioned. Shock and Awe! So many details to mention, like ‘George Bush’ calling in a warning, and how the three tramps were not even cuffed when they walked past Lansdale with a subtle smirk. The next day when Nixon landed in NY he said he could not remember where he was the day before.
        The Lee Harvey Oswald story is as laughable as Mohammed Atta, or Adam Lanza, or Bin Laden Beltane, or Underwear Bomber Christmas. I could rant all night and call it Shivaratri. Without dal though I would run out of gas.
        (Composing hisself like Robbie Parker, Jack squints into the camera): “To Surf and Predict the Constitution”.

      • Yes Prouty is a great resource for the JFK hit. It was indeed he who first latched on to the “tramps” pictures. And he IDs Landsdale, who he had known for years, as being present in Dealy.

        Prouty’s ‘Secret Team’ document is one of the best there is on the coup and JFK hit.


  3. “My God, they are going to kill us all.”~John Connally on November 22, 1963 sitting in Kennedy’s limo during the assassination.

    Have you thought about the use of this particular language?

    Who are the “they” Connally is referring to? Doesn’t it seems more surprised to have been hit himself that the fact that there was shooting?

    Frankly it is an expression that indicates foreknowledge. A lot of people have read it that way, and those who argue that the idea is silly, are typically the ones that reject ANY of the evidence of a conspiracy to kill JFK.

    Once a certain amount of evidence accumulates towards the positive, that there was indeed an organized hit by the deep state apparatus, small things such as Connally’s remarks, must be seen in that light. This is a matter of context in logic.


    • Connally might or might not have known about the stag party with all the pertinent characters just prior, especially with LBJ like himself being a good old boy from Texas and HW describing himself as a Houston oilman, and Murchison a Texan. Maybe Connally had an idea who ‘they’ were and was flabbergasted he almost got shot since he was not the bad boy targeted.
      That would be similar to the Fuddy Duddy story. Just goes to show the risk anyone takes to ‘join the club’. No honor among thieves.
      What is your take?

    • S’funny, I was just looking at that drawing above, that is in the Tyrannoludi vidjoe and thinking about the original, which is literally a ‘thumbnail’. I scanned that from one of my journals from the early to mid 80’s.

      The drawing is in ballpoint pen, it’s about an inch and a half high… a tiny thing, but it scanned in pretty tight nevertheless. I did the color work in Photoshop. I was able to increase the size pretty much as I first scanned it in as a bitmap. I did a print out of this on 8×10 paper for my physical portfolio, and it looks like it was made to be that size.

      Ah the wonders of modern technology. Aye boys and girls.


  4. Say,

    Is there anyone dropping in here that goes by he gravitational pull of Citrino 105?

    If so I would like for you to leave a comment here on my blog.

    Thanks, Willy – \\][//

  5. My single, ‘No Soul’ is now available at CD Baby.

    I’d like you all to check out the page at the URL below. And listen to the snippit of the song. And of course I encourage all to download the song as well. At 99 cents it is a pretty good deal.

    Of course those of you who know me well enough to have my email address can just email me and I will send you an mp4 for free.




        My X3… that is my third ex-wife, the PsychoSlut wanted a bulldog. She spent more than a month researching what it is that made a “good bulldog” – pedigree, coloring, size, bla bla bla…

        I didn’t give a shit one way or the other, it was all her trip. Finally she found a bulldog pup for sale nearby somewhere – The San Fernando Valley area, we lived in Van Nuys at the time. I was doing stuff. I was sculpting, making a mold, something. So I said, “it’s your thing, get the dog if you like it”.

        NOPE!!! Wrong answer!!!


        “Do you want to go see the puppy with me” (she said)
        “But of course darling whatever your heart desires.” (he said).

        So we went to this house where they raised bulldogs. They had several from a new litter about whelping age. “I like this little guy! (she said) “Yea! Me too! He’s so cool!!!” (he said. But he didn’t say, whatever the fuck!! Lets get this over and done!)

        You see, these were the early ‘Training Days’ … not for the bulldog pup … for “daddy” by “mommy” standard template bullshit USA.

        House Warming Party. Soon after getting the bulldog. Looking back the bulldog was to be a prop of ‘MommyDaddyVille’ the TV show she was producing (in her mind).
        Introductions to friends of her’s I hadn’t already met were scripted thus; “This is Willy we are getting married” (not really agreed to yet – but WTF?) “Oh yes he is so handsome when he is ‘cleaned up’, he really has ‘potential!” (Key word there, “potential” – one that began an echo pinging in the back of my mind and didn’t land with full force until years later)

        ‘She’ was a nurse specializing in neonatal at this time. She had also just began going back to college for a masters degree as a ‘Nurse Practitioner’. A lot of the new friends I met at the house warming party were in the medical field…or roaming around in the weeds of similar type places. They were pleasant enough, generally well ‘educated’ and “liberal” (know what I mean? Yea that)

        [FFWD>>] About 7 years later. Things are ‘funny’ now. Not funny; “haha”, but peculiar – things have gotten WEIRD between the two of us. I am not ‘with the program’ my “potential” is not being reached – or even sought after on my part “WTF??” (she says). The script has gotten more antagonistic on her part. She has a LIST of infractions with constant updates (a lot like this fucking computer!), and any time we have a ‘disagreement’ she reads me the riot act from her ever growing list. And just to put a smiley face on it she always adds at the end, “and YOU are the one who wanted the bulldog!”

        You see things went bad with the bulldog. He was always dumb as a rock, but a sweet fellow. But one day she realized he still had his balls. Can’t have that! It was too late in a dogs life to have him neutered. But she took him in and had it done anyway.

        Of course the dog didn’t realize what it really was, but something was ‘different’ and he was instinctively pissed off. He started pissing on our bed every time both of us were gone together. Of course this was NOT in her script. But he kept doing it anyway (Fuck You mom!!) Lol. And that was the point that I was the one who had wanted the bulldog.

        I won’t go into the whole ‘horse thing’ – she wanted to ride Dressage… but that is an even longer and more complex tale. But the foregoing was the meaning behind the title of this page.

  6. “I like Gramsci’s motto, combining “pessimism of the intellect” with “optimism of the will.”
    ~David Ray Griffith

    Craig McKee: Why did you decide to so often cite the controversial and much criticized work of researchers Frank Legge, David Chandler, and Jonathan Cole?

    DRG: “If you have read Chapter 7, you know that I explain at great length why I reject the view endorsed by these men, namely, that the Pentagon was struck by American 77 (or at least a Boeing 757).
    I discussed these men because they were useful for the purposes of this chapter, namely, that although there has been much controversy about “what hit the Pentagon” (an airliner, some smaller aircraft, or no aircraft whatsoever), these men, as three scientists who have endorsed the 757 thesis, very clearly state that the attack on the Pentagon was an inside job, which could not have been pulled off by al-Qaeda. They illustrate the fact, therefore, that there is consensus within the 9/11 movement, shared by those who accept and those who reject the 757 thesis, that the attack on the Pentagon was an inside job.”


    • Griffith says he likes Gramsci’s motto. I wonder what else he likes about Gramsci?
      Gramsci was a Marxist, and the founder of the Italian Communist Party in 1921.
      Of course one can read Gramsci and like aspects of his philosophy and not embrace communism. I have even heard praise of Gramsci from a Muslim woman I knew well. She said he was an elegant thinker and writer.
      I have not read him. I can’t read everything that is proposed to me as good. But I do have to say that I am opposed to most communist philosophies that I have read. I am opposed to socialism at the core of it’s proposals. I have written extensively on the matter during my time at COTO. I won’t go into it here and now.

      What I will say is that I am opposed to government. Not simply this fascist state we suffer under in today’s Amerika, but all government. All government is a racket. Any government that sustains itself for a long enough period becomes authoritarian and oppressive.

      At any rate I have found that many of the “leaders” of the 9/11 Truth movement have left leaning tendencies, and I find that naive, to fall for the false Left/Right paradigm.

      Enough of my ruminations for now…


  7. Although I have a great deal of respect for David Ray Griffith, and his heroic efforts throughout these years, I find the term “consensus” is stretched beyond it’s limit here.
    That “the attack on the Pentagon was an inside job,” is a vague and nebulous concept that has no real substance until it is fleshed out with facts that prove the event at the Pentagon did not involve the crash of any type of aircraft. This is much deeper and profound, once this is understood.

    Accepting Frank Legge, David Chandler, and Jonathan Cole’s “research” into the Pentagon event as in anyway legitimate is utter foolishness, beyond the pale, and completely unacceptable in my view. They have hand-waved, and dismissed key evidence that must be addressed. Until this is done in a straight forward and honest fashion by the Legge camp, there can be no suggestion of a “consensus” within the fragmented ‘Truth Movement’.

    Consensus is a chimera, an imaginary creature of the naive.


    • Will, the thing about David Ray Griffith that bothered me early on was the lack of the word “israel” in the index of his books. His work is lame on “Who and Why”. He did not even do very well on “How”. He more or less stalled out at “What”. By contrast, Christopher Bollyn went deep into the Who, and he got beat up in his front yard for it. The Brits would not even let him into the country recently.
      Find out whom you cannot criticize if you want to know who rules you, was Voltaire’s parthian shot to us.
      Meanwhile, Ken O’keefe walks the talk-

      • I know what you mean Jack. A lot of people simply won’t go there. And even those who are willing to lay that angle out straight with no chaser, aren’t necessarily apt to lean on it in every conversation.

        Like I alluded to in my last comment on DRG, what “inside” means must be articulated precisely and with great detail. Who are the big kahuna howlies? Well, there are some subtle distinctions to be made, as “the lesser brethren” are as clueless as virgins.

        We might growl that they ought not be – but, MANY THINGS OUGHT NOT BE.


      • That’s a good point Will,which goes back to the nature of our existence, who we are, and where we came from as humanity. The flip side to the things that ought not to be is the things that are, and that includes human nature with its gatekeepers, hierarchies, division of labor, and arbitrage of the self vs. hive. I am about halfway through Edward O. Wilson’s “The Social Conquest of Earth” in which he compares all socialized critters to see what the key nature of them and their evolution is. So far he is saying there are competing alleles for war and altruism in our makeup. It is as if we are stuck with the regime we have had throughout the neolithic and even further back to the campfires, because of the nature of eusocialization encoded in our DNA acting subconsciously in our amygdalas. He says human nature is not a place most of philosophy wants to go. However, there is no reason why humanity should settle for the lowest possible intelligent organization just because it has inherited hive mentality. We seem to be like the frog and scorpion halfway across the river. The scorpion eventually acts out its nature. However the difference with us is we are all the same species, and our nature is partly intelligent, conscious, and altruistic capable of sussing out weird and false behaviors threatening the hive. Successful hives do not allow in counterfeiters. .
        it is understandable that globally, people see the cargo cult and worship it with all its bread and circuses as a successful hive enterprise. It seems like 9/11 was the shocker that began to unsettle the comfy assumptions about where we are headed. As Gauguin said in his last painting, “Where did we come from, who are we, and where are we going?”.

    • As Gauguin said in his last painting, “Where did we come from, who are we, and where are we going?”.~Jack

      That is one of my favorite remark/questions. I loved Gauguin’s paintings and life attitude.
      I spoze you saw the painting I did of him at Mucha’s harmonium {keyboard} …
      His question is a prime one for us to answer.

      I have heard of Edward O. Wilson’s “The Social Conquest of Earth”, but haven’t read it. It sounds very interesting. He seems to be tackling Gauguin’s questions with some vigor.
      Wilson has a great reputation as one of the worlds foremost modern thinkers.

      Thank you for your well considered reply,


      • Will, can you direct me to where I can see your painting of Gauguin? It’s awesome you Noa Noa about him. I used to have his prints on my walls back in college.

        Another book that dovetails with Wilson is “The Evolution of Desire, Strategies of Human Mating” by David M. Buss. It also portrays a basic conflict in evolutionary strategies, but between the sexes. Synthesis of the sexual conflict is another dialectic of human evolution. Buss is more readable than Wilson, which I struggle with and need to use a dictionary with sometimes. Wilson is not as straightforward a writer as Jared Diamond (whom he cites) or Buss, but slowly I get what he is saying. Here would be a typical instance where Wilson simplifies his fhinking and spells it out syntactically-

        “An iron rule exists in genetic social evolution. It is that selfish individuals beat altruistic individuals, while groups of altruists beat groups of selfish individuals. The victory can never be complete; the balance of selection pressures cannot move to either extreme. If individual selection were to dominate, societies would dissolve. If group selection were to dominate, human groups would come to resemble ant colonies”.

        The way I see this in my cornpone ‘translation to Jack world” is, it’s like there is a gas pedal and a brake pedal. To drive to the store we need to use both at certain times. Dose and timing of the tactics, and healthy rest stops, make the most sense. One could be a NASCAR champion and make great left turns but if that was all one could do at the wheel, one would hit the wall in the real world.

  8. Keep On Marching – SATYR

    This is the band that “almost made it” in LA in the late 1970s

    The line-up is in the end credits on the video


  9. “How the West was Won” is a very familiar term, but a more honest expression would be, ‘How the West was Stolen’ !

    The North American Genocide is arguably the worst and most complete in history as we know it.

    So why isn’t this more generally known and acknowledged? This isn’t something to simply shrug off as something from ‘The Past’. The ramifications and consequences remain to this day. It is a fact that the Nazis had a strong and valid argument that they were simply following the example of the US government and society. And any who balk at such a statement simply do not know and understand history. Does this argument made by Nazi intellectuals excuse them in anyway whatsoever?


    Yet the other part of this equation is that there is no excuse for us to deny their valid points.


  10. “Anthony
    Heard “No Soul” playing in a station with Linkin Park
    New York, United States – 53 seconds ago”
    . . . . . . . .
    Yo…I have a whole page of these…
    Just out of curiosity I reloaded my ‘Radio Airplay’ Control Panel, and found it has a column on the right side of the page with those who have listened to my song,

    . . . . . . . .
    “Natalia Laslo
    Heard “No Soul” playing in a station with Foo Fighters
    Romania – 39 seconds ago”


  11. Check this one out. Found it listening to your tunes online. Alex Jones also did one on subject too but didn’t fail to use it to hawk his wares though like he was doing Amerika a favor not using it to profit. No shame there.

  12. “An iron rule exists in genetic social evolution. It is that selfish individuals beat altruistic individuals, while groups of altruists beat groups of selfish individuals. The victory can never be complete; the balance of selection pressures cannot move to either extreme. If individual selection were to dominate, societies would dissolve. If group selection were to dominate, human groups would come to resemble ant colonies”.~Edward O. Wilson

    Of course the danger in the postmodern high-tech world comes from the new global entity, uncomprehended by the majority of mankind, and it’s thrust being steered by the global elite and their push for “Transhumanism”: wherein; human groups WILL come to resemble ant colonies.

    If we come to comprehend what both Ellul and Wilson are saying this dystopian future becomes clear as the path we are now on.


  13. The Secret Playbook of Social Media Censors – The “Counter Reset”
    By Washington’s Blog

    “…Specifically, the government spends a great deal of manpower and money to monitor which stories, memes and social movements are developing the momentum to actually pose a threat to the status quo. For example, the Federal Reserve, Pentagon, Department of Homeland Security, and other agencies all monitor social media for stories critical of their agencies … or the government in general. Other governments – and private corporations – do the same thing….

    …“Social proof” is a related concept. Social proof is the well-known principle stating that people will believe something if most other people believe it. And see this. In other words, most people have a herd instinct, so if a story ranks highly, more people are likely to believe it and be influenced by it.

    That is why vested interests go to great lengths – using computer power and human resources – to monitor social media momentum. If a story critical of one of these powerful entities is gaining momentum, they will go to great lengths to kill its momentum, and destroy the social proof which comes with alot of upvotes, likes or recommendations in social media.”


    • A pretty terrifying prognosis, this from Dave Hodges…

      A military coup in the works again for the US will not lead to happy trails. It may appear as a false flag, and be one of those “Meet the New Boss, Same as the Old Boss” scenarios.

      Predicting the future is tricky business – even trickier than interpreting the past accurately.

      It is so complex that it automatically resolves to a 50/50 chance of ‘maybe yes/maybe no

      Either way though, the future looks dim.


  14. Dark one from Hodges. Things have to come to a head at some point in time, we know something big is coming. Would much prefer it after I become lawn fertilizer though.

    • Yea Veri,

      My preferences run along the same channel…or through the same gutter pipes..[?]

      Sure would be nice to have that happy-go-lucky pleasant outlook of a dedicated follower of television… but then again, they are the ones that will turn to complete hysteria when the world does fall apart around them; like being broadsided by a two by four.


  15. Those who cannot grasp the case of what and how of 9/11, can never reach the why and who. The rational mode of investigation is grounded in certain fundamentals; MO, Motive, Means and Opportunity, and especially Cui Bono?

    Those unable or unwilling to apply these standard tools of investigation have had their thinking short circuited, because the 9/11 case is so blatantly a PR Circus. We’ve spoken to the frauds that “officialdom” has squatted to produce for us; the “Commission”, FEMA, NIST, all layers of the so-called “Federal Government” and their ties to the Military Industrial Corporations.
    The system of political power is interlinked as a grid, a matrix. And it has gained “full spectrum dominance” as a direct result of the heavy trauma induced by 9/11. As the Native American’s say; it was “Powerful Medicine”.

    Mr Ruff’s commentary is spot on. The New World Order is and has been here. This is the medium in-which we travel. The “average man” is skating along the breach of the abyss now. The psychosis of this culture is peaking red on any awareness-meter.

    A whole lot of people had better wake up and get their bearings real fast, because the window of opportunity closes as that abyss widens. Homo Vishnu Ignoramus could very well be at the end of their line.

    Then it will be the Free Men against the Terminator. Thus ye shall have bequeathed to your children and their’s for generations to come. This is not a path gone unanticipated by aware thinkers. Nor the ‘In-betweeners” that inevitably steal all ideas for their own vile ends; the drones are off the drawing board and in the field, and the war-zone is Planet Earth in its entirety.

    This much is clear, and the truth about 9/11 is entry level learning to get to the bottom of this and grasp what I just outlined.


  16. One does not counter propaganda in order to persuade the propagandist. One counters propaganda for the wider audience.



    In another passage, the philosopher writes that the Jewish people, with their “talent for calculation”, were so vehemently opposed to the Nazi’s racial theories because “they themselves have lived according to the race principle for longest”[*].

    The notion of “world Judaism” was propagated in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, the notorious forgery purporting to reveal a Jewish plan for world domination. Adolf Hitler stated the conspiracy theory as fact in Mein Kampf, and Heidegger too appears to adopt some of its central tropes.

    “Heidegger didn’t just pick up these antisemitic ideas, he processed them philosophically – he failed to immunise his thinking from such tendencies,” the notebooks’ editor, Peter Trawny, told the Guardian.

    ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

    [*]What is the substantive difference between, “The Chosen People” and “The Master Race” in a philosophical context?

    The term,“antisemitic” is meaningless rubbish; Arabic belongs to the Semitic family of languages.

    Curious phrase, “failed to immunise his thinking..” How does one immunize against thinking certain thoughts? Recognize that such thoughts are verboten? They are ‘forbidden thoughts’ that must not be considered for oneself, but simply left for ‘someone else’ to decide? What Trawny is describing is a “thought crime”.

    What is obvious is that the “Chosen People” have indeed, “lived according to the race principle for longest”.

    And of course this trope is repeated once again; “Protocols of the Elders of Zion, “the notorious forgery”…

    And so here we are at the abyss of the NWO fruition and still, this bullshit is being spread…


  18. I have yet to read a critique of the ‘Protocols of the Elders of Zion’, that actually addresses what the text says. And I would assert that anyone who has actually read the text will recognize very readily that it is a blueprint for world conquest that has indeed taken place, in every particular. It describes the world as it is today. That is not “prophesy”, that is engineering.

    Those who presume that the ‘Elders of Zion’ are simply Jews, have no concept of the nature of political power, nor the breadth of the “Might as Right” doctrine. It is this doctrine that is shared by elites worldwide that is at the core of the ‘Protocols’. One needn’t be a Jew to embrace this doctrine.


    • The Secret Instructions of the Jesuits are interesting. They were first discovered during the 30 years war {1618-1648} When the Duke of Brunswick plundered the Jesuit’s college at Paderborn in Westphalia and made a present of their library to the Capuchins of the same town. Soon after translations and reprints appeared all over Europe. The Protocols were produced after the Jesuits plan for world revolution became known. Misplaced blame is so clever.. Yes, engineered world conquest.

      • Thank you for the comment! It leads to some interesting considerations…

        Let us be perfectly clear on this then g888, as I said, * One needn’t be a Jew to embrace this doctrine. And by the same token, one needn’t be a Jesuit to embrace the doctrine of ‘Might is Right’.

        That Weishaupt was a trained Jesuit has bearing on his learning and grasp of technique. And his version of the doctrine espoused as the Protocols come under the ILLUMINATI brand. But again, it is not the brand name that defines the product. That same essential product has been updated and rebranded for centuries. The ‘new age’ corporatists models, such as CFR. Trilateral, even the National Security State, are ‘brands’ selling that essential product.

        Symbols may very as well; What is the logo? Skull & Bones (Jolly Roger)? The All Seeing Eye?, The Pentagram? The Star of David? Stars & Stripes? The Swastika? The Cross? How about the Hammer & Sickle? A Jesus & Mary Chain? Or how ’bout a baby’s arm holding an apple?

        Metaphor – allegory – gory allies and the bloodstained highway to hell … we’re all Bozo’s on this bus. (If you know about recording you can imagine how that term came about). Another thing is you don’t need a compass to make a circle; the coffee ring left by a cup is sufficient for the image to appear.

        Of major importance is; ‘Like is not’.

    • I agree Willy. Many around us only see ” the doctrine of ‘Might is Right” bullshit. All little tyrants at various levels claiming they have the tyranny that is freedom. All of this historical business is like 9/11, deep and endless. A dirty deed done dirt cheap. I spent many years in the law libraries seeking the truth. I came out of there understanding the pecking order of the bus company controlling the drivers. The legal paper trail of tyrants. The only thing we can fix here is ourselves. They want to be slaves. I learned that we can debate the various evidences surrounding events such as JFK and RFK, and 9/11. We cannot deny the facts of the legalese terminologies they’ve used to maintain their pecking order while talking around the legal terms illiterate masses trapped in wordage metaphors leading them no where.. Like that song by the Beatles, I used it in a blog, No Where Man.. In no Where Land.. I might share some links here and there with your permission of course, I don’t mean to impose or get into any wars with anyone..

      • I agree Gate88 the vast majority abhor freedom; for them it entails unbearable responsibilities – like paying attention and being here Now in the moment; rather than off into the manufactured dreamland.

        Thing is ‘technology’ will ‘mature’ long before humanity does. This species has always been breakfast for something – it can be retooled to be tasty for the Master Silicates. The red door painted black.

        You may share links as you wish, be my guest.

  19. This video [Above] is obviously not the original video released in 2002. It has clearly been enhanced. The question then arises, who did this enhancement? What more was done in the process? Where did this video come from after some twelve years?

    Even the first release had evidence of video tampering in it. As I noted before there was no date/time stamp that is always part of a surveillance video. There is no shadow of the object supposedly streaking by in a blur. There are no shadows cast by the bright explosion.

    And even in this video the explosion is the color of one caused by chemical explosives, ie; bombs – not jet fuel.

    This is much too late a date to have something like this accepted at face value. It would be a very clever way of making up a “Proof” of a Boeing hitting the Pentagon. And yet the fact remains that if a Boeing actually did hit the Pentagon, there would be many angles and views of this hit in numerous videos – all of which have been absconded by the authorities and hidden deep in the bowels of the national security state. So the central question is why this would be so. A reasonable answer is because there are no videos showing a Boeing hitting the Pentagon – because a Boeing did NOT hit the Pentagon.

    And to be very clear about all of this; if a video is finally released showing a clear image of a Boeing hitting the Pentagon at this late date, that video as well should be seen as highly suspect. It goes against all the other evidence so far discovered, especially the witness testimony of a north path approach, and the total impossibility of that approach causing the damage trajectory that has been firmly established.

    In my view the disinformation regime is playing yet another game in a long list of plays having to do with the events of 9/11.


  20. I have to say this is the best interview I have heard Gage do. And I think a large part of that has to do with the fairness with which Schnurmacher handled the show, and of course Richard having much more experience than when he first started having such interviews.

    He handled himself very well, and wasn’t baited into any of the rhetorical traps a few callers attempted to lay. And I have to hand it to Mr Schnurmacher as well, I wouldn’t be able to make a guess as to his opinion on the events of 9/11 on the basis of this show, which means he showed no bias in either direction.


  21. Is That All There Is?

    I remember when I was a little girl, our house caught on fire
    I’ll never forget the look on my father’s face as he gathered me up
    In his arms and raced through the burning building out to the pavement

    And I stood there shivering in my pajamas
    And watched the whole world go up in flames
    And when it was all over I said to myself
    “Is that all there is to a fire?”

    Is that all there is, is that all there is?
    If that’s all there is my friends, then let’s keep dancing
    Let’s break out the booze and have a ball
    If that’s all there is

    And when I was 12 years old, my daddy took me to the circus
    The greatest show on earth
    There were clowns and elephants and dancing bears
    And a beautiful lady in pink tights flew high above our heads

    And as I sat there watching
    I had the feeling that something was missing
    I don’t know what, but when it was all over
    I said to myself, “Is that all there is to the circus?”

    Is that all there is, is that all there is?
    If that’s all there is my friends, then let’s keep dancing
    Let’s break out the booze and have a ball
    If that’s all there is

    And then I fell in love
    With the most wonderful boy in the world
    We’d take long walks down by the river, or just sit for hours
    Gazing into each other’s eyes, we were so very much in love

    And then one day, he went away and I thought I’d die, but I didn’t
    And when I didn’t, I said to myself, “Is that all there is to love?”

    Is that all there is, is that all there is?
    If that’s all there is my friends, then let’s keep

    I know what you must be saying to yourselves
    If that’s the way she feels about it, why doesn’t she just end it all?
    Oh, no, not me, I’m not ready for that final disappointment

    ‘Cause I know, just as well as I’m standing here talking to you
    That when that final moment comes and I’m breathing my last breath
    I’ll be saying to myself

    Is that all there is, is that all there is?
    If that’s all there is my friends, then let’s keep dancing
    Let’s break out the booze and have a ball
    If that’s all there is


  22. The Sweetest Drug

    “Research proves thаt a high intake of саrbоhуdrаtеѕ, inсluding ѕugаr, rеlеаѕеѕ the fееl-gооd сhеmiсаl in thе brаin called ѕеrоtоnin, lеаding tо what wе ԛuitе аррrорriаtеlу call ‘а ѕugаr high’. Like any drug-induced ruѕh, this fееling is оnlу tеmроrаrу thоugh. After a fеw hоurѕ—оr еvеn a fеw minutеѕ—уоu start tо crash and уоu become tired, fatigued and lеthаrgiс–аnd сrаvе еvеn more. Sugаr is 8 timеѕ аѕ аddiсtivе аѕ сосаinе–but it’ѕ nоt оnlу lеgаl, it’ѕ аll аrоund uѕ! The wоrѕt part iѕ, thе more ѕugаr уоu eat, the highеr уоur tоlеrаnсе becomes. Whаt would make ѕоmе реорlе’ѕ tееth hurt iѕ exactly thе lеvеl of ѕugаr you lеаrn tо lоvе. While hоrmоnаl аnd genetic factors mау play a cause in fооd preferences, it’ѕ ultimаtеlу уоur own dietary habits and fооd choices that create a dеереning addiction. But the scary thing iѕ, you may be fееding thе ‘sugar monster’ withоut еvеn knоwing it!”

  23. ‘Zumba’ is a term that stood in for ‘the inexplicable’ for myself and a group of artist friends I hung out with in high school.

    Example: “you know man, it was like, zumba !” Then is some comix we sent in illustrated letters to each other it morphed into “The Land of Zumba” … sort of an alternate universe or planet…headspace, etc… This was my last year of high school, I did that in Phoenix, AZ, after my first stretch of institutionalization from 1st to 11th grade in Californication. So the artsy fartsy friends from AZ and I sent letters back and forth – all illustrated and wild. I used to have them all saved. But several moves throughout the years has found them lost in space.

    So I gurgitated from HS in Phoenix. Then, having fallen in with a bunch of hoodlum punks from that school I ended up leaving home because I got in a fight with my step dad. He called my girlfriend a little slut at the dinner table in front of the whole family…”You tell that little slut to stop calling in the middle of the night” were his exactomundo words. We were sitting at opposit ends of a long dinner table. Well, I had to defend my honor! I looked up at him and said, “If you weren’t my father I would knock you fucking teeth down your throat.” Hohohohehehehahaha!!! He saw no humor in my remarks. Took it as a challenge, he did!

    He jumped up and said, “well don’t let that stop you!!” and charged around the table.
    My mom and little brother and sister were all boohooing like the Apocalypse had arrived…

    He reached my end up the table with his hand raise like he was going to bitch-slap me… as he struck at me, I just leaned sideways in the chair and side-kicked him in the nuts. That ejected me out off the other side of the chair and I hit and rolled sprang up and faced him.
    He had this pained bewildered look on his face like “WTF just happened?” I was just calmly waiting for whatever he was going to do next. He was purple with rage, and obviously bent over a bit trying not to show his pain. He hobbled back to his chair and sat down. As I was walking out the door he was telling me to get out and never come back… I was thinking…”duh, yea…”

    So I hitched over to my ‘pal” Richard’s place. He was a real punk. I had been adopted by he and his pals when three of them jumped me after school. I was practicing the long jump… I was on the track team. I was alone out there on the field after school. Any way I saw them coming up to me, and this guy Jerry French said “I’m gonna have to fight you Whitten” … I was wearing ‘Adidas 9.9’ sprinting shoes. They had one and an array of half inch spikes on the front soles.
    Being ever the gentleman I put a foot out and displayed the weapons to Jerry. I said, “If you want to go home with your balls attached, let me take off my shoes first.”

    It was funny really, they all looked at me with their heads cocked sideways like ‘whut?’ I took off one shoe and when I had just got the other off and was standing on one leg, they all charged me. A swirl of action and grunting for less than five seconds and I was standing there looking down on all three of them laying on the ground. I still don’t know exactly what happened it was over so quickly.

    So all the sudden I was like the big daddio hard ass to these guys…Lol So they kept hanging around me at lunch and praising my fighting style and wanting me to hang with them after school and such…eventually I did. Ended up at drinking parties at Richard’s house, mostly because there were a lot of cute girls there.

    Backtracking, I should explain… I had been taking martial arts from the time I was eleven years old. The neighbor up the street was a martial arts instructor in the Air Force, when he got out of the service he came back home where we and his brothers had grown up together. He started classes with all of us attending at first.
    But I was the only one to keep up with it. I was naturally quick anyway, athletic and just into it. By the time I was 16 I could jump up and kick the ceiling in my parents house. I reckon that is about 8 foot. Like most places.

    Thing is, I didn’t really like to fight. Not real fights, like when you are mad at somebody. I always tried to avoid it if I could. But I did love sparring, practicing kata and kicking and punching bags.

    Long story … Hah … anyway I was leading up to my pal Richard getting popped for breaking his parole… (Yea what parole??) I came back from my girlfriends one day and he says he has to go to court on Monday next, and he might go back to jail – adult jail this time. I was blown away. Naive, I had no idea of this kids past.

    This all leads to why and how I ended up joining the Air Force shortly after HS. Richard came home from his hearing and said he had to join the army or go to adult jail.

    I hitched back to my mom and dads the next day while my step dad was at work and told her I was going to join the Air Force, and asked if she would check with Ernie ‘the old man’ and see if I could stay there while I put it together. It was all arranged and I was on my way to Lackland AFB for basic training by mid Dec 1965.

    That is another wild tale…for later.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s