It was a year ago this January that I first began posting on the blog, Truth and Shadows
Within the very first exchanges on the blog, the anonymous poster using the moniker, Señor el Once aka Maxwell Bridges began trying to frame me as a “government agent” – calling me a “NSA ‘Q Team’ Agent”…Whatever that is supposed to mean.
I looked it up on the web one day out of curiosity. *The only thing I found was a bowling team for NSA called Q-Team or Team-Q…something like that.
*[Note: I have since found two mentions of this on the Internet – pages that not longer seem active. The term is “Q-group”]
Projection it is said, is the best shield of a spook.
No one knows who this operator is, or if there isn’t a whole agency there I am dealing with. All the things I am accused of are likely what he or they are doing.
The point was obvious from the start. This anonymous entity is the cops, out to spot bloggers who are well informed and capable of lucid argumentation.
He/they have got some very deep games, and can be very convincing to the uninformed.
The most recent encounter on Truth and Shadows found this in the commentary:
> “I called Mr. Rogue repeatedly a liar, a cheat, and agent”~Señor El Once – MARCH 4, 2013 – 1:13 PM
> “This is what the ignorant cheat and liar, Agent Rogue, wants us to believe to.”~Señor El Once
MARCH 4, 2013 – 7:30 PM
We will come back to more about this thread in a moment, but first a bit of background, as this has been over the course of more than a year, and the situation has spread beyond just that blog, but has infected my home blog of COTO. And even the way in which this came about is now a manufactured controversy, with this unknown entity giving a revisionist version of the actual history of the whole affair.
There is a larger picture to grasp here. It has to do with a group or groups of moles that were injected into the 9/11 Truth Movement. These are double-agents, not the open shills and stooges that argue for the Official Story, but those who bring the ‘manufactured controversy’, what I have dubbed The New Wave 9/11 Movement, an organized PSYOP of apparently vast resources and departments.
I have written about this in articles and notes to be found at the following links:
The ‘Señor’ entity is mainly involved in the last entry, on the topic of DEW and Nukes as responsible for the destruction of the WTC complex on 9/11. This has been the topic of our dispute. Although the entity formerly championed the No-Planes theory for a time, and gave credence to the Video Fakery camp for some time as well. These ‘giving ins’ are, as I see it, a ‘schmooze campaign’, a technique of the ‘confidence racket’. It lends the sheen of being “open minded,” – and this entity I speak of has used that very boast as ‘ammo’ in current commentary.
The latest from the entity – MARCH 5, 2013 – 7:05 PM:
. . . . .
“Agent Rogue writes the following hypnotic PR assertion:
The whole thing hangs on the fact that there simply was no appreciable radiation.
Nope, it does not. Agent Rogue ignores…
1- the correlation of elements in the dust that spell out fission.
2- the massive energy requirements of sudden pulverization.
3- the pulverized remains.
4- the duration of under-rubble hot-spots.
5- the damage to distant vehicles along Broadway and in the park lot.
6- the damage to Banker’s Trust eventually leading to its demolition despite having been “fixed”.
7- the first-responder ailments.
8- the security around the WTC.
9- the rapid destruction of evidence.
10- the lack of testing on the evidence.
11- the elevated tritium levels.
12- the relatively low decibel measurements during the destruction (e.g., can’t be brissant explosives).
Agent Rogue makes his living by saying “no” and ridiculing other’s work. He fails to provide adequate substantiation for his own theories…”
. . . . .
This is absolutely untrue, I have indeed addressed every one of these dozen points in detail and many times over, in fact several in the very thread that this nonsense is posted to. This is why I refer to the tactic this entity uses as a ‘carousel’ – it goes ’round and ’round and never acknowledges that I have in fact addressed the points. And it is THAT technique that is the spiraling hypnotic chant.
1] There is no “correlation of elements in the dust that spell out fission” – no actual correlation has been put forth other than assertions that those elements being present together must mean something, regardless of the fact that they are all ubiquitous in the environment generally. And in fact on MARCH 5, 2013 – 5:14 PM – I give a detailed run down on those elements and how they relate or not to the event, and in which ways they do or don’t. My post was up less than an hour before the entity makes the first charge above.
2 and 3] “the massive energy requirements of sudden pulverization,” “the pulverized remains,” both are exaggerated by dismissing the fact of the actual character of the “pulverization,” which simply was not as complete to ‘dust’ as is posited by the parties who promote these exotic weapons.
WTC CONCRETE DUST TO CHUNK RATIO:
“It seems that the 9/11 truth community likewise “has been slow to
understand” that the WTC dust particles in greatest abundance
are the “supercoarse” variety rather than “fine” particles, and
that significant chunks of concrete were also found in the WTC
A previously published study of the WTC dust noted: “The
environmental science community has been slow to understand that
the acute health effects were attributable to a complex mixture of
gases and particles and that the particles in greatest abundance
(mass) in the dust were the unregulated supercoarse (>10-μmdiam)
particles, not the fine (<2.5-μm-diam) or coarse (2.5–10-μmdiam)
particles that are typically measured.”
ure_lioy.html ] Their supportive data are shown in the table at that URL.
As we examined the WTC-debris sample*, we found large
chunks of concrete (irregular in shape and size, one was
approximately 5cm X 3 cm X 3cm) as well as medium-sized pieces
of wall-board (with the binding paper still attached). Thus, the
pulverization was in fact NOT to fine dust, and it is a false
premise to start with near-complete pulverization to fine powder
(as might be expected from a mini-nuke or a “star-wars” beam
destroying the Towers). Indeed, much of the mass of the
MacKinlay sample was clearly in substantial pieces of concrete
and wall-board rather than in fine-dust form.”~Jones – Jan 2007.
[*MacKinlay at 113 Liberty Street, just across from the South
4] “the duration of under-rubble hot-spots.” – Can the nano-thermites explain the hot spots?
Yes. Since these products are capable of melting both concrete and steal, and supply their own oxygen source, I think nano-thermites can explain the hot spots.
As the obvious goal was to totally destroy the towers, I think the destruction was designed in such a way as the evidence would “eat itself” with this extended burn within the rubble. I don’t think it is ‘happenstance’ that there is unreacted thermites in the dust – I think the contingencies were well thought out and the results witnessed and documented were purposely planned for.
How this was accomplished is a matter of refining postulates that take a good deal of explanation, previously addressed:
Rubble Hot Spots:
Anyone who has watched I fire in a fireplace should understand the physics of what a chaotic wandering flare will act like; how a piece of paper can suddenly flame up from heat in the ashes.
We are not dealing with a packed fuse situation in the rubble pile.
In a sense one could say that with these new chemically nano milled metals, and the addition of various gels and even biological material, a sort of ‘time-release capsule’ can be created, useful in propellent design – but can reach out to other tasks as well, such as simply growing ‘warm’ in a sort of slow motion reaction…or reacting so quickly that it can create an open field implosion, such as the so-called fuel-air bombs, known to have been used in Iraq that creates a vacuum within the blast zone as if the area itself is a chamber.
It is when an explosive material is ‘salted’ throughout a salad of other material and items that the efficiency is lessened. The point I make in the mix scenario is not “burn-rate” which is only correct in a continuous ‘burn scenario’ and that is the whole point – wandering smolder throughout — not a continuous burn.
“As for the effects of heat, the products of the pyrolysis of 1,3-DPP at 375°C are styrene and toluene, in equal amounts (Poutsma and Dyer 1982). This can occur directly in the dry composite (Kidder et al. 2005). Additionally, high temperature oxidation of toluene is known to produce benzene (Brezinsky et al. 1984).
The spikes in VOC detection could also be explained as a result of the rapid combustion of typical materials found within a building structure. If energetic nanocomposite materials, buried within the pile at GZ, were somehow ignited on specific dates (Table 1), violent, shortlived, and possibly explosive fires would result. Such fires would have quickly consumed all combustible materials nearby. The combustible materials available, after a month or two of smoldering fires in the pile, might have been more likely to be those that were less likely to have burned completely on earlier dates, like plastics. Later combustion of such plastic materials, in violent but short-lived fires, could explain the spikes in VOCs seen on those
dates.”~Ryan et al
Understand that a ‘burn-rate’ of a material is not the same as a ‘burn case scenario’:
A “scenario’ implies a variety of circumstances, and in the case of the rubble pile a exponentially chaotic and complex theater – A ‘rating’ defines one single controlled circumstance.
5] “ the damage to distant vehicles along Broadway and in the park lot.” – These vehicles were not damaged at these distant points but were towed there to make way for the clean-up crews and dumptrucks. See: [reference] Dr. Greg Jenkins, “The Overwhelming Implausibility of Using Directed Energy Beams to Demolish the World Trade Center”, Journal of 9/11 Studies, Volume 8 (February, 2007)
[reference] Supplemental: Miscellaneous Topics DEW-Demolition Contrary Evidence
Also: Forensic Metallurgy
Metallurgical Examination of WTC Steel Suggests Explosives
Eutectic corrosion is typically a chemical attack, the rate being affected by many factors such as temperature, pressure, chemistry, presence of wear, etc.
6] “the damage to Banker’s Trust eventually leading to its demolition despite having been “fixed”
This is pure supposition and nothing but hypothetical hyperbole.
7] “the first-responder ailments.” – This point is addressed *in the very thread I am accused of ignoring this issue; Extreme Toxicity of the WTC Dust is due to its Nano-Particulate Nature:
“*Asbestos in the WTC Dust was reduced to thin bundles and fibrils as opposed to the complex particles found in a building having asbestos-containing surfacing materials. Gypsum in the WTC Dust is finely pulverized to a degree not seen in other building debris. Mineral wool fibers have a short and fractured nature that can be attributed to the catastrophic collapse. *Lead was present as ultra fine spherical particles. Some particles show evidence of being exposed to a conflagration such as spherical metals and silicates, and vesicular particles (round open porous structure having a Swiss cheese appearance as a result of boiling and evaporation). -Materials transformed by high temperature (burning). These transformed materials include: spherical iron particles, spherical and vesicular silicates, and vesicular carbonaceous particles. These heat processed constituents are rarely, if ever, found together with mineral wool and gypsum in “typical” indoor dusts.”
~RJ Lee report
This stuff was a caustic as Drano. Asbestos can cause some types of lymphoma and the towers were full of it. [*MARCH 5, 2013 – 9:30 AM]
8 – 9] “the security around the WTC. the rapid destruction of evidence.” – This point has no bearing to a “nuclear event” to exclusivity, these policies were to hide the evidence of chemical explosives, arguing otherwise must be attended by proofs of a nuclear event beyond this secondary assertion.
10] “the lack of testing on the evidence.” – I presume the entity called ‘senor’ means the lack of tests for other residues while Jones and his team were testing for Thermite. Jones and his team had already good reason to seek out the thermite as their previous tests indicated that this was what the material was they had detected. Plus it should be noted that Jones did personally check the dust, and also a steel beam he had access to for residual radiation, and found none.
11] “the elevated tritium levels.” – Tritium has been addressed ad nauseum.; especially on the page where this is again breached. There was simply none beyond an astronomically minuscule amount of radiation.
12] “the relatively low decibel measurements during the destruction (e.g., can’t be brissant explosives).” – It is IMPOSSIBLE to measure dB from sound recordings, and I have explained this over and again when this silly proposition has been put forward. I have also pointed out the ‘ear witness’ testimony, which fills the record with reports of “explosions” “bombs going off” “three loud booms” “bang bang bang” “like when they set off charges around a building for demolition”. Simply hundreds of such testimonials from those near the area, and many from those actually in the towers while the initial charges were going off.